FertilityIQ DATA

Patient Survey: Who Decides How Many Embryos To Transfer?

Summary


U.S. fertility doctors more commonly guide their IVF patients to transfer multiple embryos per transfer, but that pattern is shifting. Amidst the debate of whether the patient or doctor makes this crucial choice, doctors clearly help drive these decisions and overwhelmingly their recommendations are followed. At the same time, over a quarter of patients do not believe they are given sufficient education to make a decision and nearly a fifth of patients report being educated only immediately before transfer. And 39% of patients were not apprised of the risk to their offspring of a multiple-embryo transfer and 23% were not apprised of the risk to themselves. Disparities in education can be found depending upon the patient’s age and level of reimbursement and clearly correlate to a difference in decision-making.

Context


Multiple-embryo transfers carry dramatically higher risk of multiple gestation which drives higher risks to both mother and offspring

In fairness, these absolute percentages may seem small to some, but carrying multiple fetuses leads to premature-birth, and low-birth weight, in 57% of cases for twins and 97% of cases for triplets. Nearly a third of all twins will end up in the NICU.

Why does that matter? For one, low-birth weight and premature offspring suffer from significant emotional and cognitive disadvantages. JAMA investigated 18 studies on the subject and all 18 agreed.

For this reason, countries like Sweden, Japan and Australia have largely migrated away from multiple-embryo IVF transfers to single-embryo IVF transfers. Conversely, in the U.S. upwards of 70% of IVF cycles still involve elective multiple-embryo transfer, according to the CDC. We know of no studies in the last decade that investigate what patients are told in this process and how that influences their decisions.

Methodology


We surveyed 413 U.S. IVF patients who were eligible for single or multiple-embryo transfer. 53% of patients were treated within the last 18 months. Patients were asked a variety of questions about how they were educated on the topic of single versus multiple-embryo transfer, the extent to which their doctor made a recommendation, their ultimate choice, as well as demographic data on age, geography, level of fertility insurance, year treated and whether they had undergone PGS testing. We used a multi-variate regression analysis isolating on these factors with a 95% confidence interval to determine statistical significance. Resulst were not broken out by Day 3 vs Day 5 embryo stage.

Observations

Doctor Recommendations


Over 90% of patients say their doctor made a recommendation on the number of embryos to transfer and roughly half of those were guided towards multiple-embryo transfer. All the same, it is clear doctors have begun shifting their priorities towards single-embryo transfer.

We noted that patients living in states with weaker IVF insurance mandates, or who had not received PGS testing, were far more likely to be guided towards transferring multiple embryos. Meantime, younger patients (who are generally better candidates for single-embryo transfer) treated as recently as 18 months ago are still as likely to be directed towards multiple-embryo transfer as single-embryo transfer.

Clinician Influence


The clinician’s recommendation on the number of embryos to transfer tightly correlates with what ultimately transpires. Generally, to this point doctors assert it is the patients who drive these decisions.

In fact, most fertility patients consider their doctor to be an equal, or more-than-equal, decision maker in this process. We should point out that with each passing year it seems patients consider this decision more theirs to make.

Patient Perception of Discussion and Timing


Despite the importance of the subject matter, nearly 26% of patients regarded their discussion with their clinician to have been “somewhat or not-at-all” sufficient and over one-fifth report their only discussion transpired immediately before embryo transfer. Importantly, those patients who ultimately underwent a multiple-embryo transfer were significantly less likely to have been given enough time to make a decision.

Uneven Dissemination of Information


Patients were not provided consistent levels of information in formulating a decision. Most startlingly is the degree to which patients were not told about the risk to themselves (23%) or to their offspring (39%) of a multiple gestation birth. We consider this a first-order issue.

Clearly what patients were told about the risks and benefits of each procedure correlated with the number of embryos they elected to have transferred. When women were told of the risks to themselves of a multiple-embryo transfer, they were significantly more likely to elect for a single-embryo transfer. Women who were told that multiple-embryo transfers had higher rates of success on first transfer more often chose multiple-embryo transfer.

We noticed a patient’s age and the location where they were treated correlate with what information they were given. For instance, younger women were better educated on the risks to both mother and offspring, possibly in an effort to dissuade this population from multiple-embryo transfer. Women treated in states with stronger reimbursement (e.g. Illinois, Massachusetts, New Jersey, Maryland) were more likely to be educated on the challenges of raising twins. Older patients were more likely to be told of the theoretical benefits of multiple-embryo transfer than their younger counterparts.

Conclusion


In the minds of patients, clinicians clearly wield tremendous influence over the decision of the number of embryos to transfer. While many patients consider the nature and timing of their discussions sufficient, a non-insignificant minority do not. As we work to better understand why multiple-embryo transfer remains stubbornly high in the U.S., we would be wise to pay closer attention to how and when patients are being educated on the tradeoffs for their treatment options.

To participate in this survey and add to our bank of knowledge, please click here.

Related Courses

73k
Embryo Transfer
Learn More
We cover how many embryos to transfer, medicated vs. unmedicated cycles, fresh vs. frozen, and the do's and don'ts on transfer day itself.
Featuring experts from
Columbia, NYU, +3 more
339k
IVF - In Vitro Fertilization
Learn More
The most complex fertility treatment, this course will help you do it right the first time.
Featuring experts from
NYU, CCRM, +7 more
37k
PGT-A Genetic Screening
Learn More
Giving you the full picture: where it helps, where it doesn’t, and how you might think about this expensive add-on based on your specific priorities.
Featuring experts from
NYU, Mount Sinai, +6 more
304k
IUI or "Artificial Insemination"
Learn More
Data on IUI success rates depending on who you are, what it costs, the risks, and how to decide between doing IUI and IVF.
Featuring experts from
Columbia, Stanford, +6 more
13k
ICSI
Learn More
ICSI costs $3–$5k but only improves birth rates in specific circumstances (hint: it’s not as simple as “helps with male factor”). We break down when it’s truly helpful.
Featuring experts from
Mount Sinai, NYU, +6 more
15k
Endometriosis
Learn More
Breaking down all the data and information on what endometriosis is, how to best diagnose it, and what the best treatment is depending on who you are
Featuring experts from
Stanford
67k
Egg Freezing
Learn More
Preparing you to be a confident self-advocate as you make decisions around fertility preservation.
Featuring experts from
Columbia, Mount Sinai, +3 more
27k
Acupuncture
Learn More
Does acupuncture & traditional Chinese medicine really make a difference for fertility? See the data on IVF, other fertility treatments, and trying naturally with acupuncture and Chinese herbs.
63k
Lifestyle Choices, From Diet To Supplements
Learn More
All the data on lifestyle choices and their impact on fertility, including decisions around diet, exercise, drinking alcohol, caffeine consumption, smoking, recreational drugs, and using supplements.
Featuring experts from
UCLA, Mount Sinai, +4 more
43k
Male Factor Infertility
Learn More
Male factor infertility impacts anywhere between a third and half of a couple's difficulty in conceiving. The primary factors often end up being related to varicocele or some form of azoospermia. While a semen analysis can help characterize if there is an issue, the test can be inconsistent, difficult to interpret.
Featuring experts from
Mount Sinai, Cornell
5k
Paths to Parenthood For Single & Gay Dads: An Introduction
Learn More
Introducing the major decisions a gay couple or single man may face in order to become fathers. Tips on finding a clinic, selecting an egg donor & gestational carrier (surrogate), pros and con of twins, and costs involved. See an overview of adoption & foster care for gay and single dads.
Featuring experts from
UCSF, Harvard, +11 more
9k
The IVF Laboratory
Learn More
Lab quality determines success. This course explains how to vet a lab to give yourself the best chance of a good outcome.
Featuring experts from
NYU, Columbia, +6 more

Related Lessons